This was taken in Wichita, if you couldn't tell

In Defense of the Ecoboost Mustang

When I tell self-proclaimed car enthusiasts that I own an Ecoboost Mustang, 9 times out of 10 the next sentence out of their mouth is as follows: “Why didn’t you buy the V8?”

I should keep a tally.  If I had to estimate, in the first 6 weeks of ownership I’ve been asked this question approximately 3,526 times.  If I had a nickel…

This was taken in Wichita, if you couldn't tell

On April 17th, 1964, Ford introduced a car that would become legendary.  The Ford Mustang.  Despite forecasting less than 100,000 sales in its first year the Mustang was an instant surprise hit: between the now infamous ‘1964 and 1/2’ model year and the 1965 model year Ford sold over 650,000 Mustangs, making it the company’s most successful new car launch since the Model A.

The original Mustang became an instant classic, and at the time was available with either an inline six cylinder or a Windsor V8.  Interestingly enough, the Mustang name was first used by Ford on a 1962 mid-engined concept powered by a V4 engine.  That’s right, folks: the 4 cylinder Ford Mustang outdates the V8.

Yep, it's a 4 cylinder

Mustang I Concept, Credit Wikimedia Commons

Fast forward about 50 years to December 5th, 2013: the global unveiling of the iconic Mustang’s sixth generation.  Ford introduced the 2015 model as a 50th anniversary tribute to the original with a bit of a twist.  This would be the first truly global market Mustang, a new sports car designed to go toe to toe with the traditional European sports car manufacturers.  To help in this battle the new generation of Mustang would be equipped with something not seen in a Mustang since 1986: a turbocharged 4 cylinder engine

4 Cylinders of Fury

Image shamelessly stolen from the internet because I don’t have a picture of my engine

I would hope that last sentence didn’t surprise any of our readers, but just in case it did let’s continue the history lesson.  In the 1970s America faced an oil crisis.  Gas prices were rising, and people were starting to realize that emissions regulations were a bit too lax.  Between the high gas prices and the power sucking emissions requirements starting to take hold, the muscle car was dying.  Once proud V8 powerhouses were reduced to wheezing shells of their former selves.  By 1982 the V8 Mustang GT could only manage a measly 160 hp.  Something had to be done.  That something became known as the SVO.

Image credit Wikimedia Commons

Image credit Wikimedia Commons

In 1984 Ford introduced the 2.3L, 4 cylinder turbocharged Mustang SVO.  It was rated at 175 horsepower and 210 ft-lbs of torque making it the fastest Mustang of its time.  Ford wasn’t playing games with the SVO, either: it featured high end suspension and a crazy bi-plane wing to make it the best performing Mustang in the lineup.  By the time the SVO ended its production in 1986 it was capable of producing more than 200 horsepower while returning a combined average of about 24 miles per gallon.  At the time the SVO was the most expensive Mustang, which was ultimately its downfall: production numbers were quite low and the SVO went away with the 1987 model year refresh of the Mustang.

Of course the new Ecoboost Mustang isn’t quite the same as the SVO.  True, it has the same 2.3L of displacement, but it’s no longer the top of the line.  It’s the middle of the range, a step above the V6 and below the 5.0 V8.  While it may not be the top performer of the line up anymore (the GT350R took that crown and locked it away deep, deep underground), it’s certainly no slouch: 310 horsepower.  320 lb-ft of torque.  0-60 in 5.5 seconds.

IMG_3274

For reference, that’s faster than any standard GT was until 1999.  The 2005 GT was only .5 seconds faster to 60.  The first Coyote V8 GT was only 1 second faster to 60.  Is the Ecoboost slower than a V8?  Of course it is.  Is it slow? Absolutely not.

It certainly won’t win any drag races with V8 Mustangs, but I’m an autocrosser.  On the autocross course the lightweight I4 gives the Mustang surprisingly good balance, giving minimal understeer.  The independent rear suspension keeps the car composed throughout corners, making it an absolute joy to drive.  Gone are the days where a Mustang was only good at the drag strip, this is truly a modern sports car, albeit a heavy one.

The best part?  That 5.5 second zero to 60 time and great handling comes with little penalty to the wallet: in my 6 weeks of ownership I have seen about 26 miles per gallon driving about 60% highway and 40% city.  Cruising on the highway the car has reported as much as 33 MPG average!  In my opinion the Ecoboost Mustang is truly a ‘have your cake and eat it too’ sports car.  It’s fast enough to get into trouble on the streets, but efficient enough to avoid the fuel pump for long stretches.

In their quest to go toe-to-toe with the Europeans, Ford succeeded in making the sixth generation Mustang a very nice car.  The interior is very well appointed, in my case equipped with supple heated and cooled leather seats, a 12 speaker sound system, large touchscreen interface, 4 different driving modes, 3 different steering modes, blind spot monitoring, backup camera with cross-traffic alert, user-selected interior lighting, and more.  Oh, and the car shines a Mustang logo on the ground by the doors at night.  This is a no-compromises American grand tourer.

 

IMG_3085

The Ecoboost Mustang’s biggest problem might just be that it’s called a Mustang.  It’s a wonderful car who’s owners will never avoid being asked that inevitable question: why didn’t you buy the V8?  To those reading this don’t be surprised if their answer is the same as mine: because I wanted the Ecoboost.

IMG_3154

Spread the word. Share this post!

11 Comments

  1. Bill

    Reply

    i agree wholeheartedly with this article. I rented an EcoBoost fastback last year and fell in love with it. Took it on a day trip and got a legit 32 mpg. I special ordered my 2016 EcoBoost Pony Convertible and am enamored with it. The quality is amazing and it’s an absolutely solid car. This is my 10th Mustang and by farther eat one made. 🙂

    • Bill

      Reply

      Damn iPhone and auto correct!!! My last sentence above should say…..It’s by far the best one I’ve ever had.

  2. Don

    Reply

    Wife and I are considering a new Eco-Boost Mustang for many similar reasons:

    1: Better weight distribution/handling.
    2: Better fuel economy.
    3: Less expensive to buy.
    4: Less expensive to insure.
    5. We’re old. We don’t care what other people think, and it’ll still be quicker than my old ’90 5.0 LX was.

  3. mykrrrr

    Reply

    I’m with Chad…love the SVO decal and great write up.

    I toy with the idea of an EB Mustang to replace my Focus ST (daily driver/autocross). So much so that my wife gets suspicious when I start de-modding the car.

  4. Laury Booth

    Reply

    Love your article, I currently have a 98 cobra conv. a 2005 supercharged GT. as well as our 2015 EB with performance pack. the Ecoboost has become our new favorite .in fact the other two never get out of the garage anymore.

  5. Bruce

    Reply

    I had the choice between a base model GT and a premium package convertible eco-boost, with the budget that I had. Here in Sonoma County I am driving through country roads and the Pacific coast highway by the ocean. And since the weather is nice here most of the year, driving with the top down with the good stereo going is a real pleasure. I belong to the Sonoma County mustang club, we’re all mustangs are valued. I belong to the Sonoma county Mustang club, where all Mustangs are valued. I love my Ecoboost.

Leave Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

In Defense of the Ecoboost Mustang

by Jacob L time to read: 4 min